At most time, speed
represents efficiency and productive as many employees want their
employers and their business models to have fast response and
reaction and complete missions fast. Many people use computers to
boost up their productivity in terms of calculation speed and other
types of efficiency, companies use computers to speed up their
execution speed to allow them to make more business activities and
decisions in the constrained period of time. However, does speed only
provide competitiveness and strength? What is the cost of increasing
the speed?
The benefits of
having faster speed are relatively more obvious. Firstly ,when a
company is able to execute more business decisions and activities
than its competitors, it is more likely to generate more revenues and
profits, and gain more market shares, as its productive capacity is
greater than its competitors. Secondly, when a company is able to
receive information faster, it can have more time for analysis or
make responses ahead of its competitors. In some markets, especially
the financial market, the access to information is crucial and in
some cases it can determine the difference between success and
failure. Thirdly, when a company is able to make faster analysis,
the benefit of it is similar as when it can faster receive
information, it can get upper hand advantage. Of course there are
many other benefits. Since the benefits are obvious, I do not want to
discuss too much on its benefit.
Increasing speed has
its down side and costs. Firstly, the cost of increasing speed is
geometrically growing. It is much easier to increase the speed from
5km/h to 10km/h than to increase the speed from 7200km/h to 7205km/h.
As the difficulty increases enormously, the cost as well increases
enormously. Sometimes, it is merely impossible to further increase
the speed upon certain limits; for example, based on our current
technology, it is impossible for us to reach the light speed, though
we have been trying to get closer to the light speed. Secondly, once
a speed technology is available, it forces all companies to increase
their expenditures to reach the fastest possible speed in order to
compete with each other. However, the efficiency of such investment
is questionable, as the cost of speeding up its business may be much
greater than the revenue improvement. When speed is used fro
marketing, the function of increasing speed is no longer about
productivity, instead its function becomes a signalling effect to
present companies’ abilities of having certain achievement. For
example, customers like screens with higher and higher resolutions;
however, upon certain point, our human eyes cannot really tell the
differences. Thirdly, speed is a magnifier it can enlarge the
revenues and profits, but it can enlarge the costs and risks as well.
Our human beings have our limits of reaction and response speed. When
the speed is too fast, we are no longer able to cope with the issues
and mistakes occurred in our superspeedy business model. Fourthly,
speed is not always desirable in every single sector. Nowadays, we
are dealing with machine more and more often that not only employees
use their computers as their primary working tools, customer services
are starting to use AI rather than human beings. It is almost certain
that in the future, direct communication between human beings could
become rarer and rarer; maybe patient listeners could become a very
popular luxury service.
To conclude, the
cost of further increasing speed is incredibly high, as it could
potentially be used by large companies to win over their small
competitors; however, when speeding up becomes the mainstream of our
life, slowing down could potentially become a new popular luxury
service.
No comments:
Post a Comment