The
UK government requires some companies to report the gender pay gap within their
companies and only half of the companies submit their reports before the
deadline. The reports generally show the females receive lower incomes than the
males on average. However, I do not think the reports can fairly represent the
issue of gender pay gap because of its design. The main issue in this report is too many variables are omitted in
the reports.
The
report represents the gender pay gaps overall and in
several quantiles. However, we do not have any idea about what exactly causes
the pay gaps. The differences in salaries could be caused by many factors, not
only their genders. Without gender discrimination, we have to admit females and
males are different. In addition, females and males do choose different career
pathways. Some people may argue the different career pathways are caused by the
gender discrimination that exists in our society; however, we cannot truly blame
the companies that force the females to choose such career pathways unless if
the companies forces females to fit in the positions that they do not want. In
addition, de jure discrimination is much easier to be corrected, but de facto
discrimination is extremely difficult to be corrected. The UK government wants
to use the report to observe; however, if the government identifies it is a de
facto discrimination, it should observe the early stage of people's live, such
as education and entry jobs. Because after people overcome their early stages
of career, their future incomes are far more predictable. Therefore, it is more
important to observe the early pathways people choose rather than observe the
entire labour population as a whole.
No comments:
Post a Comment