Economics
is good at pursuing a way to explain phenomenon in the real world and captures
some basic "economic" rules in our life; however, economics can never
precisely describe the entire picture of the world. For example, economics is
about how individuals make decisions based on profits (utility) and costs, when
economics come to individual cases, it is hard for any economist to find a
general and direct method to calculate the marginal cost, which is an extremely
concept in economic theories studying firms' strategies. Moreover, when
economists are talking about utility, utility is significantly dependent of
individual tastes, different individuals can have different utility, economists
tend to use a mean individual to represent the entire population, but it is
just not possible to be sure if a right mean individual is found.
Secondly,
economics describes the current situation based on economists' expectations of
the future and does not deliver the prophecy. Economists tend to think
individuals and the economic system behave or function in a typical cycle or
following certain rules. No one knows the future, so based on several
assumptions that create a stable and reasonable system, economists form some
expectations of the future and create models based on these expectations.
Furthermore, when economists tend to make predictions, they also bring the idea
of stability from the models to the reality, by projecting a trend, they make
their predictions along this trend which comes from their models.
Thirdly,
economics is not natural science, though it tends to be mathematical and
data-intensive. Because economics studies social issues that largely involves
numbers, economists tend to bring in the concepts of experimental science,
statistics and mathematics. The findings do not come from the nature, they come
from the interaction between individuals and such interaction can change over
time.
No comments:
Post a Comment