When we are buying
some product, for example, a smartphone, we face a plenty of varieties of
smartphones, but we need to spend more than what we want on something which
meets all our requirements. Why is this the case? I think that the companies do
understand their customers, and they are doing this intentionally. Because they
understand their customers' preferences, they are able to find the "sweet
spot" for their customers. However, this may not be able to let the
companies make as many profits as possible, especially when the companies are
not in a very competitive market.
Customers generally
choose the second best product, and the companies can exploit this behaviour.
Companies can produce three tiers of a product. The top tier is of course the
product with the best spec and a very high price, the spec is unnecessarily high
for most customers and the price is also too high for most customers. The
bottom tier is the product with the lowest spec and a slightly low price, the
price is low but not necessarily low enough to match the spec. Since both
varieties are not attractive enough for most customers, here comes the middle
tier. The middle tier has slightly higher spec than most customers need, but
not high enough to match the top tier; the price is high but matches its spec
better than the bottom tier. Under such circumstance, customers are likely to
pay higher prices than what they initially want for the middle tier.
However, when the
competition increases, such strategy will not work well, because if the
preferences of customers are not served perfectly, someone will enter the
market and produce something that well matches the customers' general needs.
No comments:
Post a Comment