Centrality is an
important concept in social networking and measures the influence of one node
in its network. There are many approaches to measure centrality, such as degree
centrality, betweenness centrality, eigenvector centrality and etc. Degree centrality
may be the simplest and the most intuitive measure of centrality; however, why
other measures also exist? This is because the imperfection in these centrality
measures. I am not going to talk about the technical details about these
centrality measures. It is very complex when we are trying to measure the
influence. There are two questions that we need to answer. The first one is
what influence is and the second one is what factors determine influence.
Influence is the
power that determine the outcome of the entire network. When one is more
influential, it means this person (or party) has greater power to determine the
outcome. This is not a tricky question, and can be solved by a dictionary.
However, the second question really makes the entire thing much more
complicated. There are so many factors determining the influence of a node in
the network. For example, the influence can be determined by how many other
nodes are connected this node. The direction of information flow can be another
determinant. There are other factors. Even if we are possible to list out all
the determinants, there will be another issue, which is the most important
determinant and which is the least important and how they are different from
each other in terms of their power determining the influence. Different people
can have different answers to these questions, which means there is no
universally agreed measure of influence.
No comments:
Post a Comment