Several
billionaires, including George Soros and Chris Hughers, back the plan of taxing
on the super wealthy (the top 0.1%), they believe that this tax can be helpful
to many aspects, such as environmental issue, health care and others. However,
some billionaires dislike the idea for the obvious reason. Politically, the
Democratic Party is fully behind this plan and several Democratic presidential
candidates even propose some very radical plans about how they are going to tax
the super wealthy if they can win the presidential election next year.
If an economy seems
to be full of opportunities, then people will generally dislike this idea,
because each individual sees themselves may get super rich one day in the
future, then the heavy tax on the super tax is seen by people to be the tax on
their futures. Therefore, high tax rates may not be popular in the rapidly
developing economies, and high tax rates are not helpful for generating rapid
economic development. However, in a stable economy where the economic growth is
stable and relatively low, people have much fewer opportunities to climb up
their social ladder, many people are locked in their social classes. Under such
circumstance, the wealth gap within the society becomes a significant issue
which can lead to social instability, and a tax on the super wealth which can
narrow the wealth gap significantly seems necessary.
I think that the
billionaires who back the plan see the necessity of the tax in the US society
and they also want to guide how the government uses the tax collected from
them.
No comments:
Post a Comment